e-ISSN: 2717-7157
  • Home
  • Aims and Scope
  • Editorial Board
  • Instructions for Authors
  • Table of Contents
  • Contact
  • Türkçe
Current Issue
Archive
Search
Online Subscription Login
Subscription Form
Most Popular
Download Articles Read Articles
Automated Perimetry
Carbonic Anhydrase Inhibitors
Intra Ocular Lens Power Calculation and Optic Biometry...
Visual Field Defects in Glaucoma
Visual Field Defect and Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Defect in a Case of Optic Nerve Head Drusen...
Current Minimal Invasive Angle Procedures Without Implants for the Treatment of Glaucoma...
Intra Ocular Lens Power Calculation and Optic Biometry...
Automated Perimetry
Carbonic Anhydrase Inhibitors
Visual Field Defect and Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Defect in a Case of Optic Nerve Head Drusen...
Glokom-Katarakt 2014 , Vol 9 , Num 3
Turkish Abstract Abstract PDF Similar Articles Mail to Author
Evaluation of Corneal Biomechanical Properties Changes with Aging and its Effect On Intraocular Pressure
Ayşe Gül KOÇAK ALTINTAŞ1, Özlem BEYAZYILDIZ2, Emrullah BEYAZYILDIZ3, Gültekin KÖKLÜ4
1M.D. Associate Professor, Ulucanlar Training and Reseach Eye Hospital, Ankara/TURKEY
2M.D. Asistant, Ulucanlar Training and Reseach Eye Hospital, Ankara/TURKEY
3M.D., Gazi Mustafa Kemal State Hospital, Eye Clinic, Ankara/TURKEY
4M.D., Ulucanlar Training and Reseach Eye Hospital, Ankara/TURKEY
Purpose: To compare corneal biomechanical properties changes in normal subjects with aging and evaluate its effect on intraocular pressure (IOP).

Material and Methods: Group 1 was composed of 46 eyes of 23 subjects who were under 50 years old and group 2 was composed of 54 eyes of 27 subjects who were equal or above 50 years old. Corneal biomechanical properties were measured with Ocular Response Analyzer (ORA). Corneal hysteresis (CH), corneal resistance factor (CRF), corneal compensated intraocular pressure (IOPcc) and Goldmann-correlated intraocular pressure (IOPg) were obtained from ORA were evaluated as corneal biomechanical properties.

Results: Mean CH levels were 10.1±2.1 (3.5-13.1) and 9.1±1.2 (7.6-13.0) mmHg in Group 1 and Group 2, respectively. The mean CH levels were significantly lower in Group 2 (p=0.01).The mean CRF levels were 10.5±2.2 (4.8-13.9) and 9.2±1.3 (6.8-12.2) mmHg in Group 1 and Group 2, respectively. The mean CRF levels were significantly higher in Group 1 (subjects below 50 years old) (p=0.004). Mean IOPg levels were 16.6 ±4.1 (9-25.9) mmHg in Group 1 and 15.2 ±3.1 (8.8-20.4) mmHg in Group 2 and mean IOPcc levels were 17.3±4.2 (12-25.5) mmHg in Group 1 and 17±3.1 (11.5-22.6) mmHg in Group 2. The mean IOPcc and IOPg levels were not significantly different between groups (p>0.05).

Conclusion: According to our results corneal biomechanical properties were changed with aging process and IOP measurements were also affected by corneal biomechanical properties related to aging process and IOP values obtained from GAT were lower than IOP values of ORA results. Keywords : Intraocular pressure, cornea hysteresis, cornea resistance factor, ocular response analyzer

Home
Aims and Scope
Editorial Board
Instructions for Authors
Table of Contents
Contact